ngrok alternative

The open source, self-hosted alternative to ngrok

Octelium is a free and open source, self-hosted zero trust access platform. A service running on your machine is served to the Cluster over an outbound tunnel and published at a stable URL on your own domain, either openly or behind your identity provider, with policy, rate limiting and auditing in front of it.

  • Free and open source
  • Your own domain
  • No inbound ports

Every request from a human, a browser, a CLI, a workload or an AI agent is authenticated against your identity providers, authorized per request at the application layer by the Octelium Service in front of the resource, exported to your SIEM and observability stack whether it is allowed or denied, and only then routed to the upstream HTTP API, database, SSH server, Kubernetes cluster, LLM or MCP server.

Signing in once, then reaching Services with and without a client

  • A browser opens grafana.acme.com and is redirected to the Cluster sign-in page at acme.com/login.
  • jane signs in with a passkey verified by a biometric on the device, and the browser returns to the Grafana dashboard at grafana.acme.com with no client installed.
  • In a terminal, octelium connect -d opens the browser at acme.com/callback/success/approval, where the same browser session approves the login with one click.
  • ~ ❯ octelium connect -d
  • Please authenticate yourself using Octelium web Portal
  • Waiting for you to approve the login in your browser. Press Ctrl-C to cancel.
  • You are now authenticated as jane
  • Octelium has started running in detached mode.
  • ~ ❯ curl -s my-api/v1/users/42 | jq
  • {
  • "id": 42,
  • "name": "Jane Doe",
  • "email": "jane@acme.com"
  • }
  • ~ ❯ psql -h pg-prod -d shop
  • psql (17.4)
  • Type "help" for help.
  • shop=> SELECT * FROM orders LIMIT 3;
  • id | status | total
  • -----+---------+--------
  • 981 | paid | 129.00
  • 982 | shipped | 48.50
  • 983 | paid | 310.25
  • (3 rows)
  • shop=> \q
  • ~ ❯ ssh bastion
  • Welcome to Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS (GNU/Linux 6.8.0-1021-aws x86_64)

Requests authorized one by one against CEL rules in the HTTP, LLM and Kubernetes modes

  • HTTP: the HTTP Service billing is configured as follows.
  • kind: Service
  • metadata:
  • name: billing
  • spec:
  • mode: HTTP
  • config:
  • authorization:
  • inlinePolicies:
  • - spec:
  • rules:
  • - effect: ALLOW
  • condition:
  • all:
  • of:
  • - match: '"finance" in ctx.user.spec.groups'
  • - match: ctx.request.http.method == "GET"
  • - match: ctx.request.http.path.startsWith("/invoices")
  • jane, a member of the finance Group, runs curl -i billing/invoices/42 and gets HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json {"id":42,"status":"paid","total":1290}. The access log records ALLOWED GET /invoices/42 with POLICY_MATCH.
  • jane, a member of the finance Group, runs curl -i -X DELETE billing/invoices/42 and gets HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden X-Octelium-Unauthorized: true Content-Length: 0. The access log records DENIED DELETE /invoices/42 with NO_POLICY_MATCH.
  • LLM: the LLM Service openai is configured as follows.
  • kind: Service
  • metadata:
  • name: openai
  • spec:
  • mode: LLM
  • config:
  • authorization:
  • inlinePolicies:
  • - spec:
  • rules:
  • - effect: ALLOW
  • condition:
  • any:
  • of:
  • - match: '"ai-admins" in ctx.user.spec.groups'
  • - all:
  • of:
  • - match: '"ai-agents" in ctx.user.spec.groups'
  • - match: ctx.request.llm.operation == "GENERATE"
  • - match: ctx.request.llm.model == "gpt-5-mini"
  • support-bot, a member of the ai-agents Group, runs curl openai/v1/responses --json '{"model":"gpt-5-mini","input":"Hello"}' and gets { "id": "resp_68e8e1f0c4d0", "object": "response", "created_at": 1791628935, "status": "completed", "model": "gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07",. The access log records ALLOWED RESPONSES gpt-5-mini with POLICY_MATCH.
  • support-bot, a member of the ai-agents Group, runs curl openai/v1/responses --json '{"model":"gpt-5","input":"Hello"}' and gets {"error":{"message":"Octelium: unauthorized request","type":"permission_error","param":null,"code":"octelium_unauthorized"}}. The access log records DENIED RESPONSES gpt-5 with NO_POLICY_MATCH.
  • Kubernetes: the KUBERNETES Service k8s-prod is configured as follows.
  • kind: Service
  • metadata:
  • name: k8s-prod
  • spec:
  • mode: KUBERNETES
  • config:
  • authorization:
  • inlinePolicies:
  • - spec:
  • rules:
  • - effect: ALLOW
  • condition:
  • all:
  • of:
  • - match: '"sre-agents" in ctx.user.spec.groups'
  • - match: ctx.request.kubernetes.verb in ["get", "list"]
  • - match: ctx.request.kubernetes.namespace == "production"
  • - not: ctx.request.kubernetes.resource == "secrets"
  • ops-agent, a member of the sre-agents Group, runs kubectl get configmaps -n production and gets NAME DATA AGE app-config 4 12d feature-flags 2 3d kube-root-ca.crt 1 12d. The access log records ALLOWED list configmaps · production with POLICY_MATCH.
  • ops-agent, a member of the sre-agents Group, runs kubectl get secrets -n production and gets Error from server (Forbidden): Octelium: Unauthorized request. The access log records DENIED list secrets · production with NO_POLICY_MATCH.

Upstream credentials injected per request by identity in the HTTP, SSH and PostgreSQL modes

  • HTTP: the HTTP Service stripe proxies https://api.stripe.com and picks the upstream credential of every request with dynamic configuration rules.
  • elena, a member of the finance-eu Group, runs curl -s stripe/v1/account | jq '{id, country}' without holding any credential. The rule "finance-eu" in ctx.user.spec.groups selects the eu config, so Octelium injects the Secret stripe-eu and the upstream authenticates the request as acct_1Pq8EuGmbH2bXvK3. The terminal shows { "id": "acct_1Pq8EuGmbH2bXvK3", "country": "DE" }
  • pay-agent, a member of the finance-us Group, runs curl -s stripe/v1/account | jq '{id, country}' without holding any credential. The rule "finance-us" in ctx.user.spec.groups selects the us config, so Octelium injects the Secret stripe-us and the upstream authenticates the request as acct_1Nf2UsQ7cLm4RtW9. The terminal shows { "id": "acct_1Nf2UsQ7cLm4RtW9", "country": "US" }
  • SSH: the SSH Service web-01 proxies ssh://10.0.4.21 and picks the upstream credential of every request with dynamic configuration rules.
  • sam, a member of the sre Group, runs ssh web-01 without holding any credential. The rule "sre" in ctx.user.spec.groups selects the root config, so Octelium injects the Secret root-key and the upstream authenticates the request as root. The terminal shows Welcome to Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS (GNU/Linux 6.14.0-1015-aws x86_64) root@web-01:~# id uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
  • noah, a member of the developers Group, runs ssh web-01 without holding any credential. The rule "developers" in ctx.user.spec.groups selects the deploy config, so Octelium injects the Secret deploy-key and the upstream authenticates the request as deploy. The terminal shows Welcome to Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS (GNU/Linux 6.14.0-1015-aws x86_64) deploy@web-01:~$ id uid=1001(deploy) gid=1001(deploy) groups=1001(deploy)
  • PostgreSQL: the POSTGRES Service orders-db proxies postgres://10.0.2.8:5432 and picks the upstream credential of every request with dynamic configuration rules.
  • priya, a member of the backend Group, runs psql -h orders-db orders without holding any credential. The rule "backend" in ctx.user.spec.groups selects the rw config, so Octelium injects the Secret pg-rw and the upstream authenticates the request as app_rw. The terminal shows psql (17.2) Type "help" for help. orders=> UPDATE orders SET status = 'shipped' WHERE id = 42; UPDATE 1
  • bi-agent, a member of the analytics Group, runs psql -h orders-db orders without holding any credential. The rule "analytics" in ctx.user.spec.groups selects the ro config, so Octelium injects the Secret pg-ro and the upstream authenticates the request as app_ro. The terminal shows psql (17.2) Type "help" for help. orders=> UPDATE orders SET status = 'shipped' WHERE id = 42; ERROR: permission denied for table orders

Signing in with a passkey and opening the Portal

  • The sign-in page of the Cluster at acme.com/login offers login with Okta, with GitHub, or with a passkey.
  • jane@acme.com chooses Login with a Passkey and verifies it with a biometric on the device through native WebAuthn.
  • The browser is redirected to the Portal at portal.acme.com/services, which lists the Services the User can access:
  • grafana.monitoring: Grafana dashboards, Web App, Namespace monitoring.
  • aws-postgres.production: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL, Namespace production.
  • k8s-prod: Production EKS cluster, Kubernetes, Namespace default.
  • bastion.production: SSH bastion host, SSH, Namespace production.
  • github-mcp: GitHub MCP server, MCP, Namespace default.
  • openai: OpenAI API, AI / LLM, Namespace default.
Visibility and auditing

Identity-aware visibility at the application layer

Emit structured, application-layer access logs in real time and export them through OpenTelemetry OTLP to the observability, analytics and SIEM systems your organization already operates.

Read about visibility and auditing
AccessLogOTLP
ALLOWlinus@acme.compg-prod.dbPOSTGRESquery: select id, email from users limit 50
ALLOWci-runnerprod-k8sKUBERNETESverb=list resource=pods namespace=production
DENYagent-07tools-mcpMCPtools/call name=transfer policy=mcp-tools
ALLOWjane@acme.combastionSSHsession recorded, upstream user=deploy
ALLOWagent-07openaiLLMCHAT_COMPLETIONS model=gpt-5-mini tokens=1284

Cluster resources applied declaratively from YAML with octeliumctl and managed programmatically with the Go, TypeScript, Python and Rust SDKs

  • GitOps: cluster.yaml in the main branch of the ~/octelium repository describes the desired state of the Cluster. Its diff reads as follows, with + for added, ~ for changed and - for removed lines.
  • + kind: Group
  • + metadata:
  • + name: payments
  • + spec: {}
  • + ---
  • + kind: User
  • + metadata:
  • + name: alice
  • + spec:
  • + type: HUMAN
  • + email: alice@acme.com
  • + groups: ["payments"]
  • ---
  • kind: User
  • metadata:
  • name: bob
  • spec:
  • type: HUMAN
  • ~ groups: ["payments"]
  • ---
  • kind: Service
  • metadata:
  • name: billing
  • spec:
  • mode: HTTP
  • config:
  • upstream:
  • ~ url: http://10.0.3.24:8080
  • - ---
  • - kind: Service
  • - metadata:
  • - name: billing-legacy
  • - spec: ⋯
  • - ---
  • - kind: User
  • - metadata:
  • - name: john
  • - spec: ⋯
  • ~/octelium ❯ octeliumctl apply --prune .
  • Group: payments Created
  • User: alice Created
  • User: bob Updated
  • Service: billing.default Updated
  • Service: billing-legacy.default Deleted
  • User: john Deleted
  • Cluster Core resources successfully applied
  • 2 resources created
  • 2 resources updated
  • 2 resources deleted
  • Go: main.go uses the octelium-go SDK to list the Users of the Cluster and update the email and Policies of linus.
  • client, err := octelium.New(ctx)
  • if err != nil {⋯}
  • conn, err := client.Conn(ctx)
  • if err != nil {⋯}
  • api := corev1.NewMainServiceClient(conn)
  • users, err := api.ListUser(ctx, &corev1.ListUserOptions{})
  • if err != nil {⋯}
  • for _, u := range users.Items {
  • fmt.Println(u.Metadata.Name)
  • }
  • user, err := api.GetUser(ctx, &metav1.GetOptions{Name: "linus"})
  • if err != nil {⋯}
  • user.Spec.Email = "linus@acme.com"
  • user.Spec.Authorization = &corev1.User_Spec_Authorization{
  • Policies: []string{"db-readonly"},
  • }
  • if _, err := api.UpdateUser(ctx, user); err != nil {⋯}
  • fmt.Println("updated", user.Metadata.Name)
  • ~/app ❯ go run .
  • alice
  • bob
  • linus
  • updated linus
  • TypeScript: main.ts uses the @octelium/sdk SDK to list the Users of the Cluster and update the email and Policies of linus.
  • const client = await OcteliumClient.create({
  • domain: "acme.com",
  • auth: {⋯},
  • });
  • const users = await client.coreV1.listUser(ListUserOptions.create());
  • for (const u of users.response.items) {
  • console.log(u.metadata?.name);
  • }
  • const { response: user } = await client.coreV1.getUser(
  • GetOptions.create({ name: "linus" }),
  • );
  • user.spec!.email = "linus@acme.com";
  • user.spec!.authorization = User_Spec_Authorization.create({
  • policies: ["db-readonly"],
  • });
  • await client.coreV1.updateUser(user);
  • console.log("updated", user.metadata?.name);
  • await client.close();
  • ~/app ❯ npx tsx main.ts
  • alice
  • bob
  • linus
  • updated linus
  • Python: main.py uses the octelium-sdk SDK to list the Users of the Cluster and update the email and Policies of linus.
  • async with await OcteliumClient.create() as client:
  • users = await client.core_v1.list_user(ListUserOptions())
  • for u in users.items:
  • print(u.metadata.name)
  • user = await client.core_v1.get_user(GetOptions(name="linus"))
  • user.spec.email = "linus@acme.com"
  • user.spec.authorization.policies = ["db-readonly"]
  • await client.core_v1.update_user(user)
  • print("updated", user.metadata.name)
  • ~/app ❯ python main.py
  • alice
  • bob
  • linus
  • updated linus
  • Rust: main.rs uses the octelium SDK to list the Users of the Cluster and update the email and Policies of linus.
  • let client = Client::from_env().await?;
  • let mut api = client.core_v1();
  • let users = api.list_user(ListUserOptions::default()).await?;
  • for u in users.into_inner().items {
  • println!("{}", u.metadata.unwrap_or_default().name);
  • }
  • let options = GetOptions {
  • name: "linus".into(),
  • ..Default::default()
  • };
  • let mut user = api.get_user(options).await?.into_inner();
  • let spec = user.spec.get_or_insert_default();
  • spec.email = "linus@acme.com".into();
  • spec.authorization.get_or_insert_default().policies = vec!["db-readonly".into()];
  • let user = api.update_user(user).await?.into_inner();
  • println!("updated {}", user.metadata.unwrap_or_default().name);
  • ~/app ❯ cargo run -q
  • alice
  • bob
  • linus
  • updated linus
Comparison

Octelium and ngrok, capability by capability

Both products are compared from the same structured capability dataset and evaluated using the same evidentiary standard. Emerging or experimental capabilities are marked as partial regardless of vendor.

Capability comparison

Dataset reviewed August 2026

This is a curated subset of the full capability matrix, including areas where either product differs and areas where their capabilities are equivalent. Open the complete matrix for every row, source and filter.

Architecture

Architecture

Octelium
Kubernetes-native identity-aware proxy/gateway architecture in which policy evaluation is separated from enforcement, with client-based WireGuard/QUIC access, clientless BeyondCorp access, declarative resources, and self-hosted control/data planes.
ngrok
Cloud-hosted reverse proxy/gateway with agents connecting private services to ngrok's edge. Endpoint and Traffic Policy model for routing, inspection, and traffic actions.

Authentication

OpenID Connect

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
Yes

SAML 2.0

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
Yes

Native FIDO2 / Passkey

Native means implemented by the platform itself, not merely delegated to an external IdP.

Octelium
NativeFIDO2/Passkey/WebAuthnN with attestation and hardware-resistant authenticator checks
ngrok
No

Workload Identity

Octelium
OIDC assertions / workload identity
ngrok
No

Anonymous / Public Access

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
Public endpoints supported

Authorization & Policy

Policy-as-Code

Octelium
CEL + OPA
ngrok
Traffic Policy

Per-Request Authz

For L7 products, this means each HTTP/gRPC/API/K8s request can be evaluated. For overlays, session/connection policy is not counted as per-request. This modeling choice structurally favors L7 gateways over network overlays.

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
HTTP/endpoint policy

L7-Aware Policies

Octelium
HTTP, gRPC, K8s, DB, SSH, mTLS-related context
ngrok
HTTP/API traffic policy

Device Posture

Octelium
TPM/FIDO2/device attributes
ngrok
No

L7 Protocol Awareness & Secretless Access

HTTP / HTTPS

Octelium
L7-aware + secretless credential injection
ngrok
L7 gateway

gRPC

Octelium
Native L7 mode
ngrok
Partial

SSH

Octelium
Secretless / embedded SSH patterns
ngrok
No

PostgreSQL

Octelium
Secretless + query-aware policy/logging
ngrok
No

MySQL

Octelium
Secretless + query-aware policy/logging
ngrok
No

Kubernetes

Octelium
Secretless + verb/resource/namespace policy
ngrok
K8s operator/exposure; not K8s semantic authz gateway

Raw TCP / UDP

Octelium
TCP and UDP
ngrok
TCP endpoints; UDP not a core general VPN capability

HTTP Manipulation

Octelium
With native plugins including Lua, Envoy ExtProc, JSON schema validation, cache, rate limits
ngrok
Traffic Policy actions

Transport & Networking

WireGuard Data Plane

Whether the product's own client/data plane is built on WireGuard, versus a proprietary or TLS-based transport.

Octelium
Kernel / userspaceWireGuard via kernel module, TUN, or unprivileged userspace (wireguard-go) implementations.
ngrok
No

NAT Traversal

Octelium
Via GatewaysReaches resources behind NAT through Cluster Gateways; client-to-Gateway path rather than a direct P2P mesh.
ngrok
PartialEdge-relayed through ngrok's network, not P2P.

Visibility, Auditing & Observability

OpenTelemetry-Native

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No

L7-Aware Access Logs

Octelium
HTTP/gRPC/K8s/DB/SSH identity-aware logs
ngrok
Inspection/replay/logs

SSH Session Recording

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No

Access Methods

Client-Based VPN / Overlay

Octelium
WireGuard / QUIC
ngrok
No

Clientless Browser Access

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
Public/protected web endpoints

Private DNS

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No

Dynamic Configuration

GitOps / Declarative Config

Octelium
Kubernetes-like resources / YAML
ngrok
YAML/Terraform/K8s

AI / MCP / Agent Compatibility

AI / LLM Gateway

Octelium
Native LLM Service modeProtocol-aware OpenAI/Anthropic gateway: validated operations, per-request authorization on model, tools and token limits, CEL-based model selection, and token usage in access logs.
ngrok
AI gateway positioning

MCP Gateway / MCP Access

Octelium
Native MCP Service modeProtocol-aware MCP gateway: JSON-RPC method and tool-level authorization, protocol version pinning, origin validation, and managed-container MCP upstreams.
ngrok
Partial

Deploy Containers / PaaS

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No

Gateway Capabilities

API Gateway

Octelium
Rate limit, cache, schema validation, Lua, ExtProc
ngrok
Native gateway / traffic policy

Kubernetes Ingress / Gateway

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
K8s operator / gateway patterns

Reverse Proxy / Tunneling

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
Yes

Scalability & Cloud-Nativeness

Auto Horizontal Scaling

Octelium
PEP/PDP can scale independently
ngrok
SaaS edge

High Availability

Octelium
K8s-native HA model
ngrok
SaaS edge

Openness & Self-Hosting

Fully Self-Hosted

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No

Server Code Open Source

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No

No Mandatory Proprietary Cloud

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No

Data Sovereignty

Octelium
Yes
ngrok
No
Questions

Frequently asked

How does a local service get published without opening a port?
A Service upstream can be an address that is only reachable from the side of a connected client. That client, running octelium connect with the --serve or --serve-all flag, announces that it is willing to serve the Service, and the Cluster forwards requests to it over the client's own outbound tunnel. Nothing inbound is opened on the machine or its network.
Do I get my own domain and a stable URL?
Yes. A published Service is reached at its own public FQDN under the domain your Cluster was installed with, and the public DNS record and TLS certificate for it are managed by the Cluster. The URL is part of the Service definition rather than something assigned per session, so it does not change when a tunnel is restarted.
Can something be published without any authentication?
Yes. Anonymous public access switches off authentication and authorization for a Service, which is what a webhook receiver or a public demo usually needs. Anonymous authorization can then still be enabled, so the Service filters on path, method, headers, query parameters and body content while remaining publicly reachable, and rate limiting is available as a plugin.
Is it only for HTTP?
No. Alongside HTTP, WEB and gRPC, a Service can run in SSH, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kubernetes, DNS, SOCKS5, browser-based RDP, MCP and LLM modes, or in generic TCP and UDP mode for anything else. The application-layer modes add per-request authorization, secretless upstream credentials and protocol-aware auditing on top of the tunnel.
What does it take to run the Cluster?
The quick installer provisions a complete single-node Cluster, including Kubernetes itself, on one fresh Linux VM with 2 vCPUs, 2 GB of RAM and a domain you own. That is enough for development and personal use. Larger deployments run on scalable managed or on-premise Kubernetes installations.
Is Octelium free and open source?
Yes. Octelium is designed for self-hosting and does not require a proprietary hosted control plane. The core platform is free and open source. An optional enterprise package adds capabilities for organizations with additional operational, identity-management and security requirements, including the web console, SCIM provisioning and Secret encryption at rest.
Get started

Run Octelium on your own infrastructure

Install a self-hosted Cluster and start applying identity-aware access control to your Services.